RTYY vs. AMDL
RTYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.
Performance
RTYY vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTYY achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 395.18% return.
RTYY
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- -8.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDL
- 1D
- 8.25%
- 1M
- 135.69%
- YTD
- 395.18%
- 6M
- 371.52%
- 1Y
- 1,189.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RTYY vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RTYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF | 7.96% | -13.78% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 395.18% | -2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTYY and AMDL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTYY vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
RTYY
AMDL
RTYY vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF (RTYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTYY | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.56 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
RTYY vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTYY drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTYY and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTYY | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -88.63% | +66.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.04% | 0.00% | -8.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.79% | -48.58% | +36.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.53% | — |
Volatility
RTYY vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTYY | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 46.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 94.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.44% | 129.41% | -97.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 116.59% | -85.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 116.59% | -85.15% |
RTYY vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTYY vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
RTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.61%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RTYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF | 82.61% | 13.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTYY and AMDL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RTYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RTYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.
RTYY has the higher dividend yield at 82.61%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.
RTYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RTYY and 1.15% for AMDL.
Find the right allocation for RTYY and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer