RTYS.L vs. BBSC
RTYS.L (Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF) and BBSC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - RTYS.L tracks the Russell 2000 TR USD while BBSC tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RTYS.L returned 5.95%/yr vs 6.64%/yr for BBSC. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTYS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBSC.
Performance
RTYS.L vs. BBSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RTYS.L having a 16.53% return and BBSC slightly lower at 15.75%.
RTYS.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 16.96%
- 1Y
- 39.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
BBSC
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 35.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
RTYS.L vs. BBSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTYS.L Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF | 16.53% | 12.51% | 10.09% | 18.90% | -21.01% | 13.97% | 11.57% |
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 15.75% | 10.38% | 12.31% | 20.07% | -19.75% | 15.44% | 11.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTYS.L and BBSC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between RTYS.L and BBSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
RTYS.L vs. BBSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RTYS.L
BBSC
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
RTYS.L
BBSC
Technology
RTYS.L
BBSC
Healthcare
RTYS.L
BBSC
Financial Services
RTYS.L
BBSC
Consumer Cyclical
RTYS.L
BBSC
Real Estate
RTYS.L
BBSC
Energy
RTYS.L
BBSC
Basic Materials
RTYS.L
BBSC
Utilities
RTYS.L
BBSC
Communication Services
RTYS.L
BBSC
Consumer Defensive
RTYS.L
BBSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTYS.L vs. BBSC — Risk / Return Rank
RTYS.L
BBSC
RTYS.L vs. BBSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (RTYS.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTYS.L | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 3.79 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | 12.35 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTYS.L | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.90 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.29 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.49 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
RTYS.L vs. BBSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTYS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.15%, which is greater than BBSC's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTYS.L and BBSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTYS.L | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.15% | -30.96% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -9.54% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -29.32% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -30.96% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -1.48% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.15% | -11.49% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.92% | +0.32% |
Volatility
RTYS.L vs. BBSC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (RTYS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) at 4.91%. This indicates that RTYS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTYS.L | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 4.91% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.46% | 12.98% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.68% | 19.12% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 22.93% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.16% | 22.86% | -0.70% |
RTYS.L vs. BBSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTYS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RTYS.L vs. BBSC - Dividend Comparison
RTYS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.06% | 0.18% |
RTYS.L Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTYS.L and BBSC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RTYS.L.
RTYS.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RTYS.L and 0.09% for BBSC.
Find the right allocation for RTYS.L and BBSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer