PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RTYS.L vs. MARA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RTYS.LMARA
YTD Return18.08%7.41%
1Y Return42.91%174.84%
3Y Return (Ann)1.07%-30.84%
5Y Return (Ann)9.70%84.55%
10Y Return (Ann)8.48%-14.24%
Sharpe Ratio1.711.48
Sortino Ratio2.542.41
Omega Ratio1.311.28
Calmar Ratio1.361.73
Martin Ratio9.424.44
Ulcer Index3.83%36.63%
Daily Std Dev21.59%109.59%
Max Drawdown-42.15%-99.74%
Current Drawdown-0.96%-83.69%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between RTYS.L and MARA is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

RTYS.L vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RTYS.L achieves a 18.08% return, which is significantly higher than MARA's 7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, RTYS.L has outperformed MARA with an annualized return of 8.48%, while MARA has yielded a comparatively lower -14.24% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.13%
24.93%
RTYS.L
MARA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RTYS.L vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (RTYS.L) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTYS.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RTYS.L, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RTYS.L, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.52
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RTYS.L, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RTYS.L, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RTYS.L, currently valued at 9.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.009.09
MARA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MARA, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MARA, currently valued at 3.71, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.003.71

RTYS.L vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTYS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the MARA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTYS.L and MARA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.67
1.26
RTYS.L
MARA

Dividends

RTYS.L vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither RTYS.L nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RTYS.L vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTYS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.15%, smaller than the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTYS.L and MARA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.96%
-83.69%
RTYS.L
MARA

Volatility

RTYS.L vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (RTYS.L) is 7.01%, while Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a volatility of 36.93%. This indicates that RTYS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.01%
36.93%
RTYS.L
MARA