PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTYS.L vs. HLGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTYS.L vs. HLGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (RTYS.L) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTYS.L achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly higher than HLGEX's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RTYS.L has underperformed HLGEX with an annualized return of 10.67%, while HLGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.78% annualized return.


RTYS.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
3.46%
YTD
16.53%
6M
16.96%
1Y
39.75%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
10.67%

HLGEX

1D
0.09%
1M
4.71%
YTD
6.63%
6M
4.87%
1Y
12.43%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
13.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTYS.L vs. HLGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTYS.L
Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF
16.53%12.51%10.09%18.90%-21.01%13.97%19.89%24.61%-12.53%14.83%
HLGEX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund
6.63%8.65%22.80%23.11%-27.08%10.67%48.33%39.73%-5.07%29.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RTYS.L and HLGEX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2011

0.48

The correlation between RTYS.L and HLGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTYS.L vs. HLGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTYS.L
RTYS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RTYS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTYS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTYS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RTYS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTYS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

HLGEX
HLGEX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HLGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HLGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTYS.L vs. HLGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (RTYS.L) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTYS.LHLGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.14

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

0.96

+2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.22

3.05

+9.17

RTYS.L vs. HLGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTYS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the HLGEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTYS.L and HLGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTYS.LHLGEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.78

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.31

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.63

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.50

+0.05

Drawdowns

RTYS.L vs. HLGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTYS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.15%, smaller than the maximum HLGEX drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTYS.L and HLGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTYS.LHLGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.15%

-57.65%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-14.19%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.71%

-25.50%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-37.16%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.15%

-37.16%

-4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

0.00%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-11.43%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

4.44%

-1.20%

Volatility

RTYS.L vs. HLGEX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (RTYS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) at 4.33%. This indicates that RTYS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTYS.LHLGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

4.33%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

13.48%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

17.37%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

22.29%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.16%

21.97%

+0.19%

RTYS.L vs. HLGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTYS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HLGEX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTYS.L vs. HLGEX - Dividend Comparison

RTYS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLGEX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.84%9.43%14.70%0.00%0.79%8.87%10.61%7.29%7.26%6.41%0.04%5.32%
RTYS.L
Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTYS.L and HLGEX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTYS.L and HLGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer