RTYS.L vs. FCIGX

In the year-to-date period, RTYS.L achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than FCIGX's -12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, RTYS.L has outperformed FCIGX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while FCIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.34% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RTYS.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FCIGX's 1.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (RTYS.L) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class I (FCIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RTYS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the FCIGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTYS.L and FCIGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RTYS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.

The maximum RTYS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.15%, smaller than the maximum FCIGX drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTYS.L and FCIGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 2000 UCITS ETF (RTYS.L) is 12.04%, while Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class I (FCIGX) has a volatility of 15.29%. This indicates that RTYS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.