PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTO vs. NVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RTO vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTO achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than NVT's 63.18% return.


RTO

1D
0.46%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
5.36%
6M
8.22%
1Y
34.16%
3Y*
-6.81%
5Y*
-0.64%
10Y*
10.98%

NVT

1D
0.80%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
63.18%
6M
63.60%
1Y
145.36%
3Y*
52.46%
5Y*
41.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTO vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RTO
Rentokil Initial PLC
5.36%19.64%-9.78%-5.92%-22.27%14.36%16.84%42.28%1.14%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
63.18%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RTO and NVT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018

0.27

The correlation between RTO and NVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RTO:

$15.56B

NVT:

$27.20B

EPS

RTO:

£1.39

NVT:

$3.00

PE Ratio

RTO:

16.48

NVT:

55.32

PEG Ratio

RTO:

8.93

NVT:

1.33

PS Ratio

RTO:

1.02

NVT:

6.29

PB Ratio

RTO:

2.85

NVT:

7.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

RTO:

£11.42B

NVT:

$4.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RTO:

£1.54B

NVT:

$1.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

RTO:

£2.16B

NVT:

$857.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTO vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTO
RTO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTO vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTONVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.51

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

8.30

-6.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.51

28.25

-22.74

RTO vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTO and NVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTO vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTO drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTO and NVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTONVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.53%

-56.18%

-30.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.56%

-16.93%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.81%

-46.67%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.94%

-46.67%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.60%

-5.98%

-16.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.51%

-11.82%

-18.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

4.96%

+0.76%

Volatility

RTO vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) is 6.46%, while nVent Electric plc (NVT) has a volatility of 12.76%. This indicates that RTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTONVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

12.76%

-6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.27%

32.57%

-11.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.51%

41.19%

-10.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.41%

36.06%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.02%

38.49%

-5.47%

Dividends

RTO vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

RTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than NVT's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.49%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RTO
Rentokil Initial PLC
2.24%2.23%2.28%1.73%1.38%1.30%0.00%0.87%1.14%1.69%2.99%1.54%

Financials

RTO vs. NVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rentokil Initial PLC and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B202120222023202420252026
2.62B
1.24B
(RTO) Total Revenue
(NVT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RTO values in GBP, NVT values in USD

RTO vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rentokil Initial PLC and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
13.9%
35.9%
Portfolio components
RTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a gross profit of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

RTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported an operating income of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

RTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a net income of 208.50M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RTO and NVT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVT has higher volatility (12.76%) compared to RTO (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTO dropped -86.53% vs NVT's -56.18%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTO and NVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer