RTO vs. ^GSPC

In the year-to-date period, RTO achieves a -7.49% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -6.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RTO having a 9.78% annualized return and ^GSPC not far ahead at 10.15%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RTO Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTO and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum RTO drawdown since its inception was -86.48%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTO and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 14.77% and 14.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.