RTO vs. ROL
RTO (Rentokil Initial PLC) and ROL (Rollins, Inc.) are both stocks. RTO operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while ROL operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, RTO returned 6.27%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for ROL. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RTO vs. ROL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTO achieves a -19.73% return, which is significantly higher than ROL's -36.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RTO has underperformed ROL with an annualized return of 6.27%, while ROL has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.
RTO
- 1D
- -3.67%
- 1M
- -22.11%
- 6M
- -24.95%
- YTD
- -19.73%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- -14.59%
- 5Y*
- -8.66%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.35%
ROL
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- 6M
- -39.67%
- YTD
- -36.33%
- 1Y
- -33.42%
- 3Y*
- -0.96%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $317.75M | $256.01M | $222.88M | |
| $49.47M | $34.31M | $29.52M |
RTO vs. ROL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC | -19.73% | 19.64% | -9.78% | -5.92% | -22.27% | 14.36% | 16.84% | 42.28% | -0.22% | 64.45% |
ROL Rollins, Inc. | -36.33% | 31.06% | 7.56% | 21.19% | 8.10% | -11.43% | 78.47% | -6.95% | 17.61% | 39.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTO and ROL is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.24 |
The correlation between RTO and ROL shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RTO:
$11.76B
ROL:
$18.27B
RTO:
£1.39
ROL:
$1.10
RTO:
12.52
ROL:
34.46
RTO:
6.79
ROL:
3.12
RTO:
0.77
ROL:
4.67
RTO:
2.16
ROL:
12.79
RTO:
£11.42B
ROL:
$3.92B
RTO:
£1.54B
ROL:
$992.44M
RTO:
£2.16B
ROL:
$862.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTO vs. ROL — Risk / Return Rank
RTO
ROL
RTO vs. ROL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RTO | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.77 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | -0.79 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | -2.03 | +1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RTO vs. ROL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTO drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than ROL's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTO and ROL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTO | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -57.27% | -29.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | -41.75% | +9.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.26% | -41.75% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.94% | -41.75% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.94% | -41.75% | -9.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.03% | -41.75% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.48% | -12.21% | -18.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | 16.22% | -8.14% |
Volatility
RTO vs. ROL - Volatility Comparison
Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) has a higher volatility of 20.68% compared to Rollins, Inc. (ROL) at 12.48%. This indicates that RTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTO | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.68% | 12.48% | +8.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.11% | 22.50% | +6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.07% | 26.67% | +8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 25.17% | +10.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.32% | 25.32% | +8.00% |
Dividends
RTO vs. ROL - Dividend Comparison
RTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than ROL's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROL Rollins, Inc. | 1.88% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.18% | 1.23% | 0.84% | 1.42% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.18% | 1.62% |
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC | 2.94% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 1.73% | 1.38% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.87% | 1.14% | 1.69% | 2.99% | 1.54% |
Financials
RTO vs. ROL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rentokil Initial PLC and Rollins, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RTO vs. ROL - Profitability Comparison
RTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a gross profit of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.
ROL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of -460.90M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -42.7%.
RTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported an operating income of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
ROL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 201.36M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
RTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a net income of 208.50M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
ROL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 143.91M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RTO and ROL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RTO has higher volatility (20.68%) compared to ROL (12.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTO dropped -86.53% vs ROL's -57.27%.
RTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTO and ROL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer