PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RTO vs. ROL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RTOROL
YTD Return-7.00%18.54%
1Y Return-5.04%33.66%
3Y Return (Ann)-14.19%13.92%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.63%16.74%
10Y Return (Ann)12.62%19.60%
Sharpe Ratio-0.061.66
Sortino Ratio0.222.09
Omega Ratio1.031.30
Calmar Ratio-0.062.68
Martin Ratio-0.1910.09
Ulcer Index13.80%3.45%
Daily Std Dev42.98%21.02%
Max Drawdown-86.49%-57.28%
Current Drawdown-36.69%-0.29%

Fundamentals


RTOROL
Market Cap$13.19B$24.74B
EPS$1.00$0.98
PE Ratio26.1052.12
PEG Ratio0.813.58
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.41B$3.31B
Gross Profit (TTM)$784.00M$1.69B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.05B$772.99M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between RTO and ROL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

RTO vs. ROL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RTO achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than ROL's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, RTO has underperformed ROL with an annualized return of 12.62%, while ROL has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.58%
8.99%
RTO
ROL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RTO vs. ROL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RTO, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RTO, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RTO, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RTO, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RTO, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.19
ROL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ROL, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ROL, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ROL, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ROL, currently valued at 2.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ROL, currently valued at 10.09, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0010.09

RTO vs. ROL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTO Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the ROL Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTO and ROL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.06
1.66
RTO
ROL

Dividends

RTO vs. ROL - Dividend Comparison

RTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than ROL's 1.20% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RTO
Rentokil Initial PLC
2.23%1.73%1.40%1.30%0.61%1.03%1.28%1.02%1.56%1.72%2.14%1.73%
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
1.20%1.24%1.18%0.99%0.61%1.27%1.29%1.20%1.48%1.62%1.57%1.49%

Drawdowns

RTO vs. ROL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTO drawdown since its inception was -86.49%, which is greater than ROL's maximum drawdown of -57.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTO and ROL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-36.69%
-0.29%
RTO
ROL

Volatility

RTO vs. ROL - Volatility Comparison

Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Rollins, Inc. (ROL) at 8.45%. This indicates that RTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.56%
8.45%
RTO
ROL

Financials

RTO vs. ROL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rentokil Initial PLC and Rollins, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items