PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RTO vs. ROL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RTO and ROL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

RTO vs. ROL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-20.46%
-5.95%
RTO
ROL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RTO:

-0.20

ROL:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

RTO:

0.02

ROL:

0.72

Omega Ratio

RTO:

1.00

ROL:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

RTO:

-0.19

ROL:

0.83

Martin Ratio

RTO:

-0.53

ROL:

2.22

Ulcer Index

RTO:

15.73%

ROL:

4.31%

Daily Std Dev

RTO:

42.81%

ROL:

20.89%

Max Drawdown

RTO:

-86.49%

ROL:

-57.28%

Current Drawdown

RTO:

-41.52%

ROL:

-10.16%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RTO:

$12.72B

ROL:

$22.45B

EPS

RTO:

$0.97

ROL:

$0.97

PE Ratio

RTO:

26.10

ROL:

47.78

PEG Ratio

RTO:

0.82

ROL:

3.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

RTO:

$2.71B

ROL:

$2.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RTO:

$385.00M

ROL:

$1.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

RTO:

$525.00M

ROL:

$589.86M

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, RTO has underperformed ROL with an annualized return of 11.95%, while ROL has yielded a comparatively higher 18.42% annualized return.


RTO

YTD

-4.78%

1M

-9.43%

6M

-20.46%

1Y

-7.14%

5Y*

-2.80%

10Y*

11.95%

ROL

YTD

0.00%

1M

-4.79%

6M

-5.95%

1Y

9.08%

5Y*

16.25%

10Y*

18.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RTO vs. ROL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RTO is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RTO is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RTO is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RTO is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RTO is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RTO is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

ROL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ROL is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ROL is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ROL is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ROL is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ROL is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ROL is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RTO vs. ROL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RTO, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.200.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for RTO, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.020.72
The chart of Omega ratio for RTO, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.001.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for RTO, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.190.83
The chart of Martin ratio for RTO, currently valued at -0.53, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-0.532.22
RTO
ROL

The current RTO Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the ROL Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTO and ROL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.20
0.46
RTO
ROL

Dividends

RTO vs. ROL - Dividend Comparison

RTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than ROL's 1.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RTO
Rentokil Initial PLC
2.41%2.29%1.73%1.40%1.30%0.61%1.03%1.28%1.02%1.56%1.72%2.14%
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
1.33%1.33%1.24%1.18%0.99%0.61%1.27%1.29%1.20%1.48%1.62%1.57%

Drawdowns

RTO vs. ROL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTO drawdown since its inception was -86.49%, which is greater than ROL's maximum drawdown of -57.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTO and ROL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-41.52%
-10.16%
RTO
ROL

Volatility

RTO vs. ROL - Volatility Comparison

Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to Rollins, Inc. (ROL) at 3.56%. This indicates that RTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.55%
3.56%
RTO
ROL

Financials

RTO vs. ROL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rentokil Initial PLC and Rollins, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab