PortfoliosLab logo
RTO vs. ROL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RTO and ROL is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RTO vs. ROL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RTO:

-0.15

ROL:

1.24

Sortino Ratio

RTO:

-0.01

ROL:

1.53

Omega Ratio

RTO:

1.00

ROL:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

RTO:

-0.16

ROL:

2.15

Martin Ratio

RTO:

-0.38

ROL:

5.82

Ulcer Index

RTO:

22.20%

ROL:

4.26%

Daily Std Dev

RTO:

40.80%

ROL:

22.06%

Max Drawdown

RTO:

-86.48%

ROL:

-57.27%

Current Drawdown

RTO:

-41.57%

ROL:

-0.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RTO:

$12.07B

ROL:

$27.50B

EPS

RTO:

$0.82

ROL:

$0.99

PE Ratio

RTO:

28.95

ROL:

57.31

PEG Ratio

RTO:

1.25

ROL:

4.96

PS Ratio

RTO:

2.22

ROL:

7.94

PB Ratio

RTO:

2.08

ROL:

20.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

RTO:

$5.44B

ROL:

$3.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RTO:

$726.00M

ROL:

$1.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

RTO:

$990.00M

ROL:

$783.59M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTO achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly lower than ROL's 23.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RTO has underperformed ROL with an annualized return of 9.38%, while ROL has yielded a comparatively higher 19.33% annualized return.


RTO

YTD

-4.88%

1M

2.96%

6M

-6.33%

1Y

-6.24%

3Y*

-8.10%

5Y*

-4.00%

10Y*

9.38%

ROL

YTD

23.56%

1M

1.32%

6M

11.94%

1Y

27.10%

3Y*

17.37%

5Y*

16.69%

10Y*

19.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Rentokil Initial PLC

Rollins, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RTO vs. ROL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RTO is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RTO is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RTO is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RTO is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RTO is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RTO is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ROL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ROL is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ROL is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ROL is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ROL is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ROL is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ROL is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RTO vs. ROL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RTO Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the ROL Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTO and ROL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RTO vs. ROL - Dividend Comparison

RTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than ROL's 1.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RTO
Rentokil Initial PLC
2.47%2.29%1.73%1.40%1.30%0.61%1.03%1.28%1.02%1.56%1.72%2.14%
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
1.13%1.33%1.24%1.18%0.99%0.61%1.27%1.29%1.20%1.48%1.62%1.57%

Drawdowns

RTO vs. ROL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTO drawdown since its inception was -86.48%, which is greater than ROL's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTO and ROL.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RTO vs. ROL - Volatility Comparison

Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Rollins, Inc. (ROL) at 4.86%. This indicates that RTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RTO vs. ROL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rentokil Initial PLC and Rollins, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.73B
822.50M
(RTO) Total Revenue
(ROL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RTO vs. ROL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rentokil Initial PLC and Rollins, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
12.5%
51.4%
(RTO) Gross Margin
(ROL) Gross Margin
RTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a gross profit of 341.00M and revenue of 2.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.

ROL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 422.37M and revenue of 822.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

RTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rentokil Initial PLC reported an operating income of 228.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

ROL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 142.65M and revenue of 822.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

RTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a net income of 111.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

ROL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 105.25M and revenue of 822.50M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.