RTH vs. VTI
RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RTH returned 14.35%/yr vs 15.02%/yr for VTI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
RTH vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 9.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RTH having a 14.35% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 15.02%.
RTH
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 12.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 26.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
RTH vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 4.33% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.62% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and VTI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RTH and VTI has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RTH vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RTH
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
RTH
VTI
Consumer Defensive
RTH
VTI
Healthcare
RTH
VTI
Industrials
RTH
VTI
Basic Materials
RTH
-
VTI
Communication Services
RTH
-
VTI
Energy
RTH
-
VTI
Financial Services
RTH
-
VTI
Real Estate
RTH
-
VTI
Technology
RTH
-
VTI
Utilities
RTH
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
VTI
RTH vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RTH | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.79 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 12.52 | -7.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RTH vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -55.45% | +13.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -8.92% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -19.30% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -25.36% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | -35.00% | +10.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -2.14% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -8.02% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 1.99% | +0.36% |
Volatility
RTH vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 3.85%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 4.50% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 9.82% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 12.64% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 17.47% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 18.33% | -0.79% |
RTH vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTH vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than VTI's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.93% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTH and VTI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTI has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to RTH (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTH dropped -42.32% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.02% vs 14.35% for RTH. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.02% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RTH.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.93% for RTH.
RTH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTH and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer