RTH vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. RTH is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTH charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

RTH vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RTH

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 9.66%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: 14.17%

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTH vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	2.29%	12.36%	20.02%	20.07%	-17.67%	14.18%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RTH and EATZ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.62

The correlation between RTH and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RTH vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RTH	EATZ
Consumer Cyclical	57.2%	78.2%
Consumer Defensive	26.8%	16.9%
Healthcare	13.4%	-
Industrials	2.6%	4.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.3%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RTH vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTH

RTH Risk / Return Rank: 25
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 29

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTH vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RTH	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RTH	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.46%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RTH	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.57%	—	—

RTH vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTH vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	0.95%	0.97%	0.77%	1.07%	1.16%	0.78%	0.64%	0.91%	1.05%	1.56%	1.84%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTH and EATZ in my portfolio?

RTH and EATZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RTH or EATZ?

On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTH or EATZ?

RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RTH or EATZ?

RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between RTH and EATZ?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 1.00% for EATZ.