RTAI vs. RDFI
RTAI (Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF) and RDFI (Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTAI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Rareview, while RDFI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Rareview. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RTAI returned -1.63%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for RDFI. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RTAI charges 3.78%/yr vs 3.69%/yr for RDFI.
Performance
RTAI vs. RDFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTAI achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than RDFI's 2.38% return.
RTAI
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 7.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- -1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.28%
RDFI
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 6.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $296.48K | $345.49K | $313.16K | |
| $4.00K | $4.73K | $23.89K |
RTAI vs. RDFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF | 1.31% | 5.54% | 7.17% | 4.33% | -22.55% | 10.62% | 5.08% |
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 2.38% | 9.83% | 13.15% | 8.57% | -17.06% | 12.51% | 8.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTAI and RDFI is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between RTAI and RDFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTAI vs. RDFI — Risk / Return Rank
RTAI
RDFI
RTAI vs. RDFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) and Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RTAI | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.88 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.58 | 3.11 | +2.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RTAI vs. RDFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.32%, which is greater than RDFI's maximum drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTAI and RDFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTAI | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.32% | -23.71% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -8.01% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.16% | -9.22% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.32% | -23.71% | -10.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -2.44% | -6.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.63% | -7.06% | -6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 2.26% | -0.70% |
Volatility
RTAI vs. RDFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) is 1.75%, while Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that RTAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTAI | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.75% | 2.37% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.59% | 6.53% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.86% | 7.37% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 8.19% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.99% | 7.93% | +1.06% |
RTAI vs. RDFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTAI has a 3.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RDFI's 3.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTAI vs. RDFI - Dividend Comparison
RTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than RDFI's 8.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 8.30% | 8.17% | 8.14% | 7.38% | 4.70% | 6.78% | 1.01% |
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF | 5.07% | 5.66% | 5.02% | 3.07% | 3.71% | 4.73% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTAI and RDFI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDFI has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to RTAI (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTAI dropped -34.32% vs RDFI's -23.71%.
On 5-year performance, RDFI leads with 2.78% vs -1.63% for RTAI. On fees, RDFI is cheaper at 3.69% per year. On volatility, RTAI has been the lower-risk option at 1.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RDFI has performed better with a 2.78% return vs -1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDFI is cheaper with a 3.69% expense ratio, compared with 3.78% for RTAI.
RDFI has the higher dividend yield at 8.30%, compared with 5.07% for RTAI.
RTAI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while RDFI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 3.78% for RTAI and 3.69% for RDFI.
RTAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTAI and RDFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer