RTAI vs. QVMS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RTAI (Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF) and QVMS (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTAI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Rareview Funds, while QVMS is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600. RTAI is actively managed, while QVMS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RTAI returned 7.37%/yr vs 15.26%/yr for QVMS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RTAI charges 3.78%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QVMS.

Performance

RTAI vs. QVMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTAI achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than QVMS's 16.84% return.

RTAI

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 2.79%
• 6M: 3.48%
• 1Y: 10.46%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: -0.71%
• 10Y*: —

QVMS

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 16.84%
• 6M: 16.99%
• 1Y: 34.90%
• 3Y*: 15.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTAI vs. QVMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF	2.79%	5.54%	7.17%	4.33%	-22.55%	0.97%
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF	16.84%	5.56%	9.50%	16.89%	-14.61%	4.45%

Correlation

The correlation between RTAI and QVMS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.32

RTAI vs. QVMS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RTAI	QVMS
Financial Services	99.0%	18.3%
Basic Materials	-	4.5%
Communication Services	-	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.6%
Energy	-	7.5%
Healthcare	-	10.8%
Industrials	-	16.7%
Real Estate	-	7.1%
Technology	-	15.5%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

RTAI vs. QVMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTAI

RTAI Risk / Return Rank: 44
RTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
RTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
RTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 41

QVMS

QVMS Risk / Return Rank: 64
QVMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QVMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QVMS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
QVMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QVMS Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTAI vs. QVMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RTAI	QVMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.99	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.90	-0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	3.87	-2.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	13.10	-6.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RTAI vs. QVMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the QVMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTAI and QVMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RTAI	QVMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	1.99	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.34	-0.16

Drawdowns

RTAI vs. QVMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.32%, which is greater than QVMS's maximum drawdown of -28.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTAI and QVMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTAI	QVMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.32%	-28.05%	-6.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-8.78%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.71%	-28.05%	+12.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.33%	0.00%	-7.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.84%	-9.11%	-4.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	2.60%	-1.09%

Volatility

RTAI vs. QVMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) is 2.90%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that RTAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTAI	QVMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	4.84%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.36%	12.04%	-6.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.62%	17.62%	-11.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.33%	21.26%	-11.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.06%	21.26%	-12.20%

RTAI vs. QVMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTAI has a 3.78% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTAI vs. QVMS - Dividend Comparison

RTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than QVMS's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.12%	1.10%	1.53%	1.51%	1.58%	0.64%	0.00%
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF	5.52%	5.66%	5.02%	3.07%	3.71%	4.73%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTAI and QVMS in my portfolio?

RTAI and QVMS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RTAI or QVMS?

QVMS has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to RTAI (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTAI dropped -34.32% vs QVMS's -28.05%.

Which ETF is better, RTAI or QVMS?

On 3-year performance, QVMS leads with 15.26% vs 7.37% for RTAI. On fees, QVMS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RTAI has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RTAI or QVMS?

Over the 3-year period, QVMS has performed better with a 15.26% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTAI or QVMS?

QVMS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 3.78% for RTAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RTAI or QVMS?

RTAI has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 1.12% for QVMS.

What is the main difference between RTAI and QVMS?

RTAI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QVMS is Multi-factor. They also come from different issuers: Rareview Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 3.78% for RTAI and 0.15% for QVMS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.