PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTAI vs. BEGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTAI vs. BEGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTAI achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than BEGS's -41.25% return.


RTAI

1D
-0.39%
1M
-3.42%
6M
-1.09%
YTD
1.31%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
-1.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.28%

BEGS

1D
-4.44%
1M
0.88%
6M
-44.88%
YTD
-41.25%
1Y
-37.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-15.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.85K$70.66K$58.45K
$4.00K$4.73K$23.89K

RTAI vs. BEGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RTAI and BEGS is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTAI vs. BEGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTAI
RTAI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BEGS
BEGS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BEGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEGS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BEGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEGS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTAI vs. BEGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTAIBEGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.94

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

-0.65

+2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

-1.21

+6.79

RTAI vs. BEGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the BEGS Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTAI and BEGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTAI vs. BEGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.32%, smaller than the maximum BEGS drawdown of -60.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTAI and BEGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTAIBEGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.32%

-60.23%

+25.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-60.23%

+54.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.67%

-56.47%

+47.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-20.76%

+7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

32.21%

-30.65%

Volatility

RTAI vs. BEGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) is 1.75%, while Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) has a volatility of 16.14%. This indicates that RTAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTAIBEGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

16.14%

-14.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.59%

56.59%

-51.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.86%

67.71%

-60.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.38%

63.24%

-53.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.99%

63.24%

-54.25%

RTAI vs. BEGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTAI has a 3.78% expense ratio, which is higher than BEGS's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTAI vs. BEGS - Dividend Comparison

RTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than BEGS's 82.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BEGS
Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF
82.09%48.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RTAI
Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF
5.07%5.66%5.02%3.07%3.71%4.73%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTAI and BEGS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEGS has higher volatility (16.14%) compared to RTAI (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTAI dropped -34.32% vs BEGS's -60.23%.

On 1-year performance, RTAI leads with 7.74% vs -37.63% for BEGS. On fees, BEGS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RTAI has been the lower-risk option at 1.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RTAI has performed better with a 7.74% return vs -37.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BEGS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 3.78% for RTAI.

BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 82.09%, compared with 5.07% for RTAI.

RTAI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BEGS is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 3.78% for RTAI and 0.99% for BEGS.

RTAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTAI and BEGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer