RSST vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
RSST and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSST is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on Sep 5, 2023. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSST or VT.
Key characteristics
| RSST | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.50% | 19.50% |
| 1Y Return | 26.93% | 32.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.16 | 2.67 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.62 | 3.64 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.47 | 3.01 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.19 | 17.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.36% | 1.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.96% | 11.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.16% | -50.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.86% | -0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSST and VT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RSST vs. VT - Performance Comparison
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with RSST at 19.50% and VT at 19.50%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSST vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSST has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSST vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSST vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than VT's 1.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF | 0.78% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.83% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
RSST vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSST drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSST and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSST vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.29%. This indicates that RSST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.