PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSSB vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSSB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return.


RSSB

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
7.65%
6M
6.97%
1Y
24.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RSSB
Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF
7.65%25.16%10.53%6.63%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and VOO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023

0.85

The correlation between RSSB and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSSB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSB
RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSSBVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.67

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.41

11.96

-3.55

RSSB vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSSBVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-33.99%

+17.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-8.90%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-3.14%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-3.68%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

1.99%

+0.90%

Volatility

RSSB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that RSSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSSBVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.42%

4.83%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

9.82%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

12.46%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

16.91%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

18.02%

-1.19%

RSSB vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSSB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSSB
Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF
3.23%3.48%1.10%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSSB and VOO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSSB has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSB dropped -16.21% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 1-year performance, RSSB leads with 24.25% vs 23.69% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSSB has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 23.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RSSB.

RSSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

RSSB is categorized as Global Allocation, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RSSB and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSSB and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer