RSSB vs. NTSI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI).

RSSB and NTSI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSSB is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on Dec 4, 2023. NTSI is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on May 18, 2021.

Performance

RSSB vs. NTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSSB vs. NTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	-2.26%	25.16%	10.53%	6.73%
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	1.54%	30.37%	1.11%	5.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than NTSI's 1.54% return.

RSSB

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -6.51%
• YTD: -2.26%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTSI

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 5.18%
• 1Y: 21.96%
• 3Y*: 12.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSB vs. NTSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSI's 0.26% expense ratio.

RSSB

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF

NTSI

WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

Return for Risk

RSSB vs. NTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSB

RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 62
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 65

NTSI

NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 68
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSB vs. NTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSSB	NTSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.33	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	1.83	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.25	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	1.79	-0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	7.12	-0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSSB vs. NTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the NTSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and NTSI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSSB	NTSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	1.33	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.32	+0.72

Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and NTSI is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RSSB vs. NTSI - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than NTSI's 3.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	3.56%	3.48%	1.10%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	3.70%	3.65%	2.92%	2.35%	2.66%	0.97%

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. NTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum NTSI drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and NTSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSB	NTSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.21%	-34.01%	+17.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.52%	-12.33%	-0.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.89%	-7.50%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-9.36%	+7.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	3.10%	+0.05%

Volatility

RSSB vs. NTSI - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) have volatilities of 7.45% and 7.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSB	NTSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	7.69%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.94%	11.35%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.17%	16.62%	+2.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.57%	15.56%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	15.56%	+1.01%