RSSB vs. GDMA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSSB (Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF) and GDMA (Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSSB returned 19.46% vs 25.16% for GDMA. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSSB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GDMA.

Performance

RSSB vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than GDMA's 10.56% return.

RSSB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: 4.80%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 1Y: 19.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.99%

GDMA

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 2.38%
• 6M: 1.94%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: 8.45%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	$1.65M	$1.00M	$708.66K
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	$1.36M	$1.99M	$1.95M

RSSB vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	7.52%	25.16%	10.53%	6.63%
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	10.56%	25.29%	7.44%	2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and GDMA is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023	0.69

The correlation between RSSB and GDMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RSSB vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSSB

RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 49
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 55

GDMA

GDMA Risk / Return Rank: 67
GDMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GDMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
GDMA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
GDMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GDMA Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSSB vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSSB	GDMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.49	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.97	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.28	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	3.12	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.54	7.24	-0.71

RSSB vs. GDMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the GDMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and GDMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. GDMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, roughly equal to the maximum GDMA drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and GDMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSB	GDMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.21%	-16.66%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-7.53%	-4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-3.21%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-3.79%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	3.24%	-0.23%

Volatility

RSSB vs. GDMA - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) at 3.27%. This indicates that RSSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSB	GDMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	3.27%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.38%	13.20%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.39%	15.80%	+0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	10.24%	+6.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	11.39%	+5.34%

RSSB vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSB vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than GDMA's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	2.53%	2.79%	2.32%	4.14%	1.18%	2.10%	0.62%	3.17%
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	3.24%	3.48%	1.10%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSB and GDMA in my portfolio?

RSSB and GDMA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSSB or GDMA?

RSSB has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to GDMA (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSB dropped -16.21% vs GDMA's -16.66%.

Which ETF is better, RSSB or GDMA?

On 1-year performance, GDMA leads with 25.16% vs 19.46% for RSSB. On fees, RSSB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GDMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSSB or GDMA?

Over the 1-year period, GDMA has performed better with a 25.16% return vs 19.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSB or GDMA?

RSSB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GDMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSB or GDMA?

RSSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.53% for GDMA.

What is the main difference between RSSB and GDMA?

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Gadsden. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RSSB and 0.77% for GDMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.