RSRFX vs. RSNRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RSRFX (Reaves Infrastructure Fund) and RSNRX (Victory Global Energy Transition Fund) are both mutual funds - RSRFX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Reaves, while RSNRX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Victory. Over the past 10 years, RSRFX returned 5.99%/yr vs 12.49%/yr for RSNRX. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSRFX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for RSNRX.

Performance

RSRFX vs. RSNRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reaves Infrastructure Fund (RSRFX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSRFX achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly lower than RSNRX's 27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, RSRFX has underperformed RSNRX with an annualized return of 5.99%, while RSNRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.

RSRFX

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -4.64%
• 6M: 8.11%
• YTD: 13.11%
• 1Y: 3.01%
• 3Y*: 12.39%
• 5Y*: 4.71%
• 10Y*: 5.99%
• ALL TIME*: 6.85%

RSNRX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -1.77%
• 6M: 12.57%
• YTD: 27.93%
• 1Y: 73.43%
• 3Y*: 26.61%
• 5Y*: 29.33%
• 10Y*: 12.49%
• ALL TIME*: 8.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RSRFX Reaves Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RSRFX vs. RSNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSRFX Reaves Infrastructure Fund	13.11%	3.73%	20.64%	1.77%	-16.84%	14.56%	1.83%	31.48%	-7.19%	5.09%
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund	27.93%	69.60%	15.94%	-8.64%	35.02%	83.01%	27.35%	-24.49%	-45.81%	1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RSRFX and RSNRX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	0.60

The correlation between RSRFX and RSNRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (10 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSRFX vs. RSNRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSRFX

RSRFX Risk / Return Rank: 6
RSRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
RSRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
RSRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
RSRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
RSRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

RSNRX

RSNRX Risk / Return Rank: 96
RSNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RSNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RSNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RSNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RSNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSRFX vs. RSNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reaves Infrastructure Fund (RSRFX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSRFX	RSNRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	3.17	-3.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	3.81	-3.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.52	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	6.30	-6.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.36	17.38	-17.02

RSRFX vs. RSNRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the RSNRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSRFX and RSNRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSRFX vs. RSNRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSRFX drawdown since its inception was -55.96%, smaller than the maximum RSNRX drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSRFX and RSNRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSRFX	RSNRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.96%	-89.73%	+33.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.72%	-11.65%	-7.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.72%	-25.09%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.35%	-25.44%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.32%	-84.27%	+47.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.85%	-7.80%	-2.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.06%	-25.82%	+15.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.12%	4.21%	+2.91%

Volatility

RSRFX vs. RSNRX - Volatility Comparison

Reaves Infrastructure Fund (RSRFX) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) at 4.87%. This indicates that RSRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSRFX	RSNRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.42%	4.87%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.84%	16.98%	-2.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.45%	23.33%	-1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.69%	24.57%	-6.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.80%	31.33%	-13.53%

RSRFX vs. RSNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSRFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSNRX's 1.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSRFX vs. RSNRX - Dividend Comparison

RSRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than RSNRX's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund	3.42%	4.38%	1.65%	2.36%	0.78%	0.00%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSRFX Reaves Infrastructure Fund	0.46%	0.66%	1.50%	3.03%	12.44%	5.16%	0.56%	7.44%	10.43%	1.08%	19.57%	2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSRFX and RSNRX in my portfolio?

RSRFX and RSNRX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSRFX or RSNRX?

RSRFX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to RSNRX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSRFX dropped -55.96% vs RSNRX's -89.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSNRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.