PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSRFX vs. PRNEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSRFX vs. PRNEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reaves Infrastructure Fund (RSRFX) and T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSRFX achieves a 21.71% return, which is significantly higher than PRNEX's 16.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RSRFX has underperformed PRNEX with an annualized return of 7.10%, while PRNEX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.18% annualized return.


RSRFX

1D
1.45%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
21.71%
6M
21.39%
1Y
15.81%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
7.10%

PRNEX

1D
-0.70%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
16.19%
6M
16.19%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
8.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSRFX vs. PRNEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSRFX
Reaves Infrastructure Fund
21.71%3.73%20.64%1.77%-16.84%14.56%1.83%31.48%-7.19%5.09%
PRNEX
T. Rowe Price New Era Fund
16.19%18.85%4.41%1.02%7.14%25.35%-2.63%16.91%-16.23%10.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RSRFX and PRNEX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between RSRFX and PRNEX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSRFX vs. PRNEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSRFX
RSRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RSRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RSRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PRNEX
PRNEX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PRNEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSRFX vs. PRNEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reaves Infrastructure Fund (RSRFX) and T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSRFXPRNEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.35

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

4.55

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

16.06

-13.69

RSRFX vs. PRNEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the PRNEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSRFX and PRNEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSRFX vs. PRNEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSRFX drawdown since its inception was -55.96%, smaller than the maximum PRNEX drawdown of -66.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSRFX and PRNEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSRFXPRNEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.96%

-66.56%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.72%

-6.59%

-12.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-20.19%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.35%

-21.50%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.32%

-49.64%

+13.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-6.59%

+3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-16.28%

+6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

1.86%

+4.97%

Volatility

RSRFX vs. PRNEX - Volatility Comparison

Reaves Infrastructure Fund (RSRFX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX) at 5.42%. This indicates that RSRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRNEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSRFXPRNEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

5.42%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.06%

11.98%

+7.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.93%

15.10%

+5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.53%

18.72%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

20.63%

-2.90%

RSRFX vs. PRNEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSRFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PRNEX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSRFX vs. PRNEX - Dividend Comparison

RSRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than PRNEX's 7.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRNEX
T. Rowe Price New Era Fund
7.78%9.04%4.81%11.46%4.47%2.07%2.54%2.18%1.69%1.89%1.28%2.68%
RSRFX
Reaves Infrastructure Fund
0.42%0.66%1.50%3.03%12.44%5.16%0.56%7.44%10.43%1.08%19.57%2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSRFX and PRNEX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSRFX has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to PRNEX (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSRFX dropped -55.96% vs PRNEX's -66.56%.

PRNEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSRFX and PRNEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer