PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPU has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 9.27%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.


RSPU

1D
-0.78%
1M
-3.70%
6M
4.75%
YTD
6.90%
1Y
7.59%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
9.27%
ALL TIME*
8.99%

RSP

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.05%
6M
9.43%
YTD
13.16%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.86B$1.85B$2.06B
$2.36M$2.33M$3.07M

RSPU vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
6.90%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
13.16%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and RSP is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006

0.50

The correlation between RSPU and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPU vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPU
RSP

Utilities

100.0%
6.6%

Financial Services

0.4%
14.8%

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.2%

Energy

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

11.8%

Industrials

-

14.6%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Technology

-

16.9%

Utilities

RSPU
100.0%
RSP
6.6%

Financial Services

RSPU
0.4%
RSP
14.8%

Basic Materials

RSPU

-

RSP
4.6%

Communication Services

RSPU

-

RSP
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPU

-

RSP
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

RSPU

-

RSP
6.2%

Energy

RSPU

-

RSP
4.2%

Healthcare

RSPU

-

RSP
11.8%

Industrials

RSPU

-

RSP
14.6%

Real Estate

RSPU

-

RSP
6.0%

Technology

RSPU

-

RSP
16.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPU vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPURSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.29

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.43

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

9.43

-7.37

RSPU vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPURSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-59.92%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-7.85%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.77%

-17.81%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-21.38%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-39.04%

+2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-1.23%

-4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-6.61%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

2.02%

+1.91%

Volatility

RSPU vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.88%. This indicates that RSPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPURSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

2.88%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

8.59%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

11.76%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

16.16%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

18.28%

+0.86%

RSPU vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPU vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.57%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPU and RSP have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPU has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to RSP (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.94% vs 9.27% for RSPU. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.

RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer