PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RSPU vs. POWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RSPU vs. POWR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) and POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. RSPU is passively managed, while POWR is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPU returned 9.73%/yr vs 8.74%/yr for POWR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

RSPU vs. POWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than POWR's 17.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPU has outperformed POWR with an annualized return of 9.73%, while POWR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.74% annualized return.

RSPU

1D
0.98%
1M
0.63%
YTD
8.91%
6M
9.36%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
9.73%

POWR

1D
-1.96%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
17.55%
6M
16.63%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
8.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. POWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF		8.91%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		17.55%10.81%-1.30%3.66%42.54%42.03%-28.30%8.44%-11.74%9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and POWR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.27

The correlation between RSPU and POWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (10 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPU vs. POWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RSPU
POWR

Utilities

99.6%
45.6%

Financial Services

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

11.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

33.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

9.5%

Utilities

RSPU
99.6%
POWR
45.6%

Financial Services

RSPU
0.4%
POWR

-

Basic Materials

RSPU

-

POWR
1.0%

Communication Services

RSPU

-

POWR

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPU

-

POWR

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPU

-

POWR

-

Energy

RSPU

-

POWR
11.0%

Healthcare

RSPU

-

POWR

-

Industrials

RSPU

-

POWR
33.0%

Real Estate

RSPU

-

POWR

-

Technology

RSPU

-

POWR
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with RSPU:
RSPU vs. XLURSPU vs. SPYRSPU vs. VPURSPU vs. UTESRSPU vs. VOORSPU vs. IDURSPU vs. JXI
Often compared with POWR:
POWR vs. GRIDPOWR vs. AIPOPOWR vs. XLUPOWR vs. PAVEPOWR vs. ZAPPOWR vs. VPUPOWR vs. XLUI

Return for Risk

RSPU vs. POWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. POWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RSPUPOWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.19
1.25

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.64
1.79

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.98

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

8.63

-4.26

RSPU vs. POWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the POWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and POWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. POWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum POWR drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and POWR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RSPUPOWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-65.98%

+17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-7.09%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-23.14%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-25.09%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-63.42%

+26.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-2.27%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-18.09%

+10.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

2.45%

+1.37%

Volatility

RSPU vs. POWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is 4.98%, while iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that RSPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RSPUPOWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

6.33%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

12.75%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.13%

16.94%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

23.08%

-6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

25.52%

-6.40%

RSPU vs. POWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSPU and POWR have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

RSPU vs. POWR - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than POWR's 5.48% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		5.48%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF		2.52%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

RSPU and POWR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWR has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to RSPU (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs POWR's -65.98%.

On 10-year performance, RSPU leads with 9.73% vs 8.74% for POWR. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPU has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 8.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPU and POWR have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 2.52% for RSPU.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

POWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and POWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer