RSPU vs. PAVE
RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPU returned 12.17%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPU charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
RSPU vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.97% return.
RSPU
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
PAVE
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 20.97%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 37.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.30%
- 5Y*
- 18.34%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPU vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 8.91% | 16.82% | 23.57% | -3.45% | 4.37% | 17.13% | -2.70% | 22.94% | 6.89% | 4.76% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.97% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPU and PAVE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.35 |
The correlation between RSPU and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSPU vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPU
PAVE
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
RSPU
PAVE
Financial Services
RSPU
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
RSPU
-
PAVE
Communication Services
RSPU
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPU
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPU
-
PAVE
Energy
RSPU
-
PAVE
Healthcare
RSPU
-
PAVE
-
Industrials
RSPU
-
PAVE
Real Estate
RSPU
-
PAVE
-
Technology
RSPU
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPU vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
RSPU
PAVE
RSPU vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 3.12 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 11.34 | -6.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPU vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.08% | -44.08% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -11.91% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -26.23% | +9.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.86% | -26.23% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -2.41% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -6.21% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 3.27% | +0.55% |
Volatility
RSPU vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is 4.98%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that RSPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 7.01% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 15.90% | -4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.13% | 19.63% | -5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 21.67% | -4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 24.40% | -5.28% |
RSPU vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPU vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 2.52% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.41% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.08% | 2.98% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPU and PAVE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to RSPU (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 18.34% vs 12.17% for RSPU. On fees, RSPU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.
RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPU and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer