RSPU vs. PKB
RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) and PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPU returned 9.57%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for PKB. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPU charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PKB.
Performance
RSPU vs. PKB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly lower than PKB's 14.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPU has underperformed PKB with an annualized return of 9.57%, while PKB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.78% annualized return.
RSPU
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
PKB
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- 27.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
RSPU vs. PKB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 6.94% | 16.82% | 23.57% | -3.45% | 4.37% | 17.13% | -2.70% | 22.94% | 6.89% | 9.43% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 14.33% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -31.11% | 24.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPU and PKB is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.40 |
RSPU vs. PKB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPU
PKB
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
RSPU
PKB
Financial Services
RSPU
PKB
Basic Materials
RSPU
-
PKB
Communication Services
RSPU
-
PKB
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPU
-
PKB
Consumer Defensive
RSPU
-
PKB
-
Energy
RSPU
-
PKB
Healthcare
RSPU
-
PKB
-
Industrials
RSPU
-
PKB
Real Estate
RSPU
-
PKB
-
Technology
RSPU
-
PKB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPU vs. PKB — Risk / Return Rank
RSPU
PKB
RSPU vs. PKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPU | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.27 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 7.21 | -3.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPU vs. PKB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum PKB drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and PKB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPU | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.08% | -65.21% | +17.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -15.41% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -29.75% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.86% | -34.85% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.85% | -52.29% | +15.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -4.31% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -15.75% | +7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 4.86% | -1.11% |
Volatility
RSPU vs. PKB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is 5.41%, while Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that RSPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPU | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 8.73% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 18.69% | -7.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 23.78% | -9.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 25.78% | -8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 27.29% | -8.19% |
RSPU vs. PKB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PKB's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPU vs. PKB - Dividend Comparison
RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than PKB's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 2.49% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.41% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.08% | 2.98% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPU and PKB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKB has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to RSPU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs PKB's -65.21%.
On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.78% vs 9.57% for RSPU. On fees, RSPU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.
RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.
RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while PKB is Building & Construction. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.60% for PKB.
PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPU and PKB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer