PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. KCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. KCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly higher than KCSH's 1.49% return.


RSPU

1D
-0.25%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
4.83%
6M
3.78%
1Y
10.96%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
9.39%

KCSH

1D
0.02%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.83%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. KCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and KCSH is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2024

-0.00

The correlation between RSPU and KCSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. KCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

KCSH
KCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
KCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. KCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPUKCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

2.16

-1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

7.00

-5.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.04

59.08

-56.03

RSPU vs. KCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the KCSH Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and KCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPUKCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

3.30

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

3.26

-2.80

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. KCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than KCSH's maximum drawdown of -0.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and KCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUKCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-0.58%

-47.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-0.58%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

0.00%

-7.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-0.03%

-7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

0.07%

+3.56%

Volatility

RSPU vs. KCSH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) at 0.06%. This indicates that RSPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUKCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

0.06%

+5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

0.83%

+10.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

1.24%

+12.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

1.33%

+15.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

1.33%

+17.76%

RSPU vs. KCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than KCSH's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPU vs. KCSH - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than KCSH's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCSH
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF
3.97%4.35%2.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.54%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPU and KCSH have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to KCSH (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs KCSH's -0.58%.

On 1-year performance, RSPU leads with 10.96% vs 4.06% for KCSH. On fees, KCSH is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSPU has performed better with a 10.96% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KCSH is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.

KCSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 2.54% for RSPU.

RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while KCSH is Ultrashort Bond. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while KCSH tracks Solactive ISS Sustainable Select 0-1 Year USD Corporate IG Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.20% for KCSH.

KCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and KCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer