KCSH vs. KBUF
KCSH (KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF) and KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive ISS Sustainable Select 0-1 Year USD Corporate IG Index, while KBUF is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares. KCSH is passively managed, while KBUF is actively managed. Over the past year, KCSH returned 3.93% vs -3.91% for KBUF. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KCSH charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KBUF.
Performance
KCSH vs. KBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCSH achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly higher than KBUF's -9.79% return.
KCSH
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.28%
KBUF
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- 6M
- -11.81%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 1Y
- -3.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.48K | $73.40K | $165.07K | |
| $1.01M | $483.51K | $350.21K |
KCSH vs. KBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KCSH KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF | 2.10% | 4.49% | 1.98% |
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -9.79% | 18.04% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCSH and KBUF is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCSH vs. KBUF — Risk / Return Rank
KCSH
KBUF
KCSH vs. KBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCSH | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.12 | 0.95 | +1.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.89 | -0.22 | +7.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.12 | -0.45 | +59.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCSH vs. KBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCSH drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum KBUF drawdown of -21.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCSH and KBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCSH | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -21.14% | +20.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.58% | -21.14% | +20.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.12% | +15.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -5.05% | +5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 10.42% | -10.35% |
Volatility
KCSH vs. KBUF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) is 0.21%, while KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that KCSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCSH | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 3.57% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.39% | 10.57% | -10.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 13.44% | -12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 14.19% | -12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 14.19% | -12.90% |
KCSH vs. KBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCSH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KBUF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCSH vs. KBUF - Dividend Comparison
KCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than KBUF's 8.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 8.33% | 7.51% | 3.53% |
KCSH KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF | 3.93% | 4.35% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCSH and KBUF have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBUF has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to KCSH (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCSH dropped -0.58% vs KBUF's -21.14%.
On 1-year performance, KCSH leads with 3.93% vs -3.91% for KBUF. On fees, KCSH is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KCSH has performed better with a 3.93% return vs -3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KCSH is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.
KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.33%, compared with 3.93% for KCSH.
KCSH is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while KBUF is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KCSH and 0.95% for KBUF.
KCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCSH and KBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer