KCSH vs. KTEC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

KCSH (KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive ISS Sustainable Select 0-1 Year USD Corporate IG Index, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KCSH returned 4.02% vs -15.69% for KTEC. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCSH charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.

Performance

KCSH vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCSH achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -19.54% return.

KCSH

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 4.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KTEC

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: -5.76%
• YTD: -19.54%
• 6M: -21.08%
• 1Y: -15.69%
• 3Y*: 3.95%
• 5Y*: -12.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCSH vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KCSH KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF	1.67%	4.49%	1.98%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-19.54%	21.01%	24.92%

Correlation

The correlation between KCSH and KTEC is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024	0.10

Return for Risk

KCSH vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCSH

KCSH Risk / Return Rank: 95
KCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
KCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 98
KCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
KCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 98

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 4
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCSH vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KCSH	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.23	-0.57	+3.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.57	-0.68	+5.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.10	0.92	+1.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.93	-0.47	+7.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	58.19	-0.90	+59.09

KCSH vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCSH Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCSH and KTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KCSH vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCSH drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCSH and KTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	KCSH	KTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.58%	-66.90%	+66.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.58%	-33.28%	+32.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-49.22%	+49.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-43.96%	+43.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	17.54%	-17.47%

Volatility

KCSH vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) is 0.21%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that KCSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KCSH	KTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.21%	8.04%	-7.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.58%	20.82%	-20.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25%	27.85%	-26.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.32%	43.20%	-41.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.32%	43.06%	-41.74%

KCSH vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCSH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

KCSH vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

KCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than KTEC's 4.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
KCSH KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF	3.96%	4.35%	2.08%	0.00%	0.00%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.17%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCSH and KTEC in my portfolio?

KCSH and KTEC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KCSH or KTEC?

KTEC has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to KCSH (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCSH dropped -0.58% vs KTEC's -66.90%.

Which ETF is better, KCSH or KTEC?

On 1-year performance, KCSH leads with 4.02% vs -15.69% for KTEC. On fees, KCSH is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KCSH or KTEC?

Over the 1-year period, KCSH has performed better with a 4.02% return vs -15.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KCSH or KTEC?

KCSH is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KCSH or KTEC?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 3.96% for KCSH.

What is the main difference between KCSH and KTEC?

KCSH is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while KTEC is China Equities. KCSH tracks Solactive ISS Sustainable Select 0-1 Year USD Corporate IG Index, while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KCSH and 0.69% for KTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.