PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. GII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. GII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than GII's 10.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPU has outperformed GII with an annualized return of 9.27%, while GII has yielded a comparatively lower 8.20% annualized return.


RSPU

1D
-0.78%
1M
-3.70%
6M
4.75%
YTD
6.90%
1Y
7.59%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
9.27%
ALL TIME*
8.99%

GII

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.09%
6M
4.95%
YTD
10.17%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
8.20%
ALL TIME*
5.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.26M$4.04M$4.11M
$2.36M$2.33M$3.07M

RSPU vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
6.90%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
10.17%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and GII is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2007

0.64

The correlation between RSPU and GII shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPU vs. GII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPU
GII

Utilities

100.0%
27.3%

Financial Services

0.4%
4.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

21.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

22.9%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

4.4%

Utilities

RSPU
100.0%
GII
27.3%

Financial Services

RSPU
0.4%
GII
4.7%

Basic Materials

RSPU

-

GII

-

Communication Services

RSPU

-

GII
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPU

-

GII

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPU

-

GII

-

Energy

RSPU

-

GII
21.6%

Healthcare

RSPU

-

GII

-

Industrials

RSPU

-

GII
22.9%

Real Estate

RSPU

-

GII
0.1%

Technology

RSPU

-

GII
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPU vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPUGIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.77

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

7.45

-5.39

RSPU vs. GII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the GII Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and GII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum GII drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and GII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUGIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-50.98%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-5.94%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.77%

-11.38%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-20.67%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-42.84%

+5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-2.39%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-11.44%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

2.20%

+1.73%

Volatility

RSPU vs. GII - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) at 2.72%. This indicates that RSPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUGIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

2.72%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

9.16%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

10.98%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

14.06%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

17.03%

+2.11%

RSPU vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSPU and GII have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

RSPU vs. GII - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than GII's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.66%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.57%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPU and GII have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPU has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to GII (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs GII's -50.98%.

On 10-year performance, RSPU leads with 9.27% vs 8.20% for GII. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPU has performed better with a 9.27% return vs 8.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPU and GII have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.57% for RSPU.

RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while GII is Infrastructure Equities. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street.

GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and GII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer