RSPU vs. ECLN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) and ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. RSPU is passively managed, while ECLN is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPU returned 10.73%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for ECLN. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPU charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ECLN.

Performance

RSPU vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than ECLN's 12.23% return.

RSPU

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -4.51%
• YTD: 5.10%
• 6M: 3.75%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 10.73%
• 10Y*: 9.42%

ECLN

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -3.19%
• YTD: 12.23%
• 6M: 10.28%
• 1Y: 19.48%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: 11.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF	5.10%	16.82%	23.57%	-3.45%	4.37%	17.13%	-2.70%	5.74%
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	12.23%	16.78%	22.60%	-3.36%	5.28%	12.26%	8.98%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and ECLN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2019	0.87

The correlation between RSPU and ECLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPU vs. ECLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPU	ECLN
Utilities	100.0%	76.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	16.3%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	6.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

RSPU vs. ECLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPU

RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 24
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 24

ECLN

ECLN Risk / Return Rank: 60
ECLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ECLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ECLN Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ECLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ECLN Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPU	ECLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.86	-1.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	2.72	-1.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.32	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	4.03	-2.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.26	10.95	-7.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPU vs. ECLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the ECLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and ECLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPU	ECLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	1.86	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.83	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.67	-0.21

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. ECLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than ECLN's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and ECLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPU	ECLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.08%	-32.28%	-15.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.46%	-5.02%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.27%	-14.68%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.86%	-19.88%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.91%	-3.58%	-3.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.85%	-5.00%	-2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	1.85%	+1.75%

Volatility

RSPU vs. ECLN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) at 3.85%. This indicates that RSPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPU	ECLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	3.85%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.17%	8.30%	+2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.98%	10.52%	+3.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	14.22%	+2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	17.41%	+1.68%

RSPU vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPU vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than ECLN's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	1.83%	1.97%	2.52%	2.54%	1.72%	1.66%	1.68%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF	2.53%	2.54%	2.39%	2.92%	2.35%	2.41%	2.94%	2.54%	3.11%	3.08%	2.98%	4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPU and ECLN in my portfolio?

RSPU and ECLN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPU or ECLN?

RSPU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to ECLN (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs ECLN's -32.28%.

Which ETF is better, RSPU or ECLN?

On 5-year performance, ECLN leads with 11.81% vs 10.73% for RSPU. On fees, RSPU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ECLN has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPU or ECLN?

Over the 5-year period, ECLN has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPU or ECLN?

RSPU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPU or ECLN?

RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.83% for ECLN.

What is the main difference between RSPU and ECLN?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.97% for ECLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.