RSPU vs. BILT
RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. RSPU is passively managed, while BILT is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPU charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.
Performance
RSPU vs. BILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than BILT's 13.47% return.
RSPU
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
BILT
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPU vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 8.91% | 1.84% |
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 13.47% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPU and BILT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPU vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank
RSPU
BILT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPU vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPU | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPU vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and BILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPU | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.08% | -5.38% | -42.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -1.42% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -1.44% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPU vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPU | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.13% | 10.28% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 10.28% | +6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 10.28% | +8.84% |
RSPU vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPU vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison
RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than BILT's 5.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.74% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 2.52% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.41% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.08% | 2.98% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPU and BILT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSPU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSPU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 2.52% for RSPU.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.60% for BILT.
Find the right allocation for RSPU and BILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer