RSPS vs. YCS
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.15%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for YCS. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
RSPS vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 4.15%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.
RSPS
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- -1.56%
- 3Y*
- -1.72%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
RSPS vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 1.64% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and YCS is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008 | 0.07 |
The correlation between RSPS and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
YCS
RSPS vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.35 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 3.97 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 12.40 | -12.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 1.92 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 1.12 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.65 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.33 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -49.56% | +13.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -8.30% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -23.05% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -27.32% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -27.32% | +1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.26% | 0.00% | -11.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -19.93% | +14.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 2.66% | +3.47% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 2.75% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 12.32% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.51% | 17.27% | -3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 21.10% | -7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 19.01% | -4.14% |
RSPS vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.87% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and YCS have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPS has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.34% vs 4.15% for RSPS. On fees, RSPS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer