RSPS vs. TRUO
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and TRUO (VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for TRUO.
Performance
RSPS vs. TRUO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RSPS
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- -0.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.16%
TRUO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPS vs. TRUO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 4.62% |
TRUO VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and TRUO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. TRUO — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
TRUO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPS vs. TRUO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF (TRUO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | TRUO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. TRUO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, which is greater than TRUO's maximum drawdown of -3.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and TRUO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | TRUO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -3.45% | -32.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -2.32% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -1.38% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.61% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPS vs. TRUO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | TRUO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 18.66% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 18.66% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 18.66% | -3.73% |
RSPS vs. TRUO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUO's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. TRUO - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while TRUO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.92% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
TRUO VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and TRUO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.00% for TRUO.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.14% for TRUO.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and TRUO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer