RSPS vs. SCHD
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.15%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for SCHD. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
RSPS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 4.15%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- -0.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
RSPS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 7.18% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and SCHD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.71 |
The correlation between RSPS and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPS vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPS
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPS
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
RSPS
SCHD
Financial Services
RSPS
SCHD
Basic Materials
RSPS
-
SCHD
Communication Services
RSPS
-
SCHD
Energy
RSPS
-
SCHD
Healthcare
RSPS
-
SCHD
Industrials
RSPS
-
SCHD
Real Estate
RSPS
-
SCHD
-
Technology
RSPS
-
SCHD
Utilities
RSPS
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
SCHD
RSPS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 5.12 | -4.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 12.47 | -11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -33.37% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -4.61% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -16.13% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -16.85% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -33.37% | +7.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | -0.03% | -6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -3.31% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 1.89% | +4.73% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.54%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 3.54% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 7.70% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 10.93% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 14.36% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 16.70% | -1.76% |
RSPS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.90% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPS has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to SCHD (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.34% vs 4.15% for RSPS. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.90% for RSPS.
RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer