RSPS vs. PSL
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.43%/yr vs 8.16%/yr for PSL. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PSL.
Performance
RSPS vs. PSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than PSL's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed PSL with an annualized return of 4.43%, while PSL has yielded a comparatively higher 8.16% annualized return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- -0.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
PSL
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 0.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
RSPS vs. PSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 4.59% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 10.74% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and PSL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.71 |
The correlation between RSPS and PSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPS vs. PSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPS
PSL
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPS
PSL
Consumer Cyclical
RSPS
PSL
Financial Services
RSPS
PSL
Basic Materials
RSPS
-
PSL
-
Communication Services
RSPS
-
PSL
-
Energy
RSPS
-
PSL
-
Healthcare
RSPS
-
PSL
-
Industrials
RSPS
-
PSL
Real Estate
RSPS
-
PSL
-
Technology
RSPS
-
PSL
-
Utilities
RSPS
-
PSL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. PSL — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
PSL
RSPS vs. PSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.02 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 0.04 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | 0.10 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. PSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum PSL drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and PSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -41.58% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -13.64% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -13.64% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -19.45% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -34.67% | +9.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.68% | -5.00% | -3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -5.81% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 6.19% | +0.24% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. PSL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) at 4.42%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 4.42% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 9.19% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 13.17% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 15.17% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 16.52% | -1.60% |
RSPS vs. PSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PSL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. PSL - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than PSL's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.97% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and PSL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to PSL (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs PSL's -41.58%.
On 10-year performance, PSL leads with 8.16% vs 4.43% for RSPS. On fees, RSPS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSL has performed better with a 8.16% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.76% for PSL.
RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PSL is Momentum. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.60% for PSL.
RSPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and PSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer