RSPS vs. PPA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.15%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for PPA. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPA.

Performance

RSPS vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 4.15%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.

RSPS

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: -0.75%
• 3Y*: -1.63%
• 5Y*: -0.02%
• 10Y*: 4.15%

PPA

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 6M: 14.31%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: 30.12%
• 5Y*: 18.31%
• 10Y*: 17.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPS vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	1.57%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	10.82%	37.15%	25.28%	18.41%	9.52%	7.09%	0.45%	39.63%	-7.51%	30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and PPA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006	0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPS and PPA has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RSPS vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPS	PPA
Consumer Defensive	96.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.1%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	90.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	9.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPS vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 8
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 8
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9

PPA

PPA Risk / Return Rank: 43
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPS vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPS	PPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	1.51	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	2.20	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.26	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	2.11	-2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.12	6.14	-6.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPS vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPS	PPA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	1.51	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.99	-1.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.85	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.66	-0.10

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and PPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPS	PPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.93%	-57.37%	+21.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.72%	-13.71%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-15.24%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.61%	-18.37%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.42%	-43.92%	+18.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.32%	-6.47%	-4.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-9.18%	+4.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.16%	4.70%	+1.46%

Volatility

RSPS vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 3.54%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that RSPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPS	PPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	6.97%	-3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	16.05%	-5.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.50%	19.12%	-5.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.60%	18.51%	-4.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	20.64%	-5.78%

RSPS vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPS vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than PPA's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.38%	0.42%	0.61%	0.67%	0.83%	0.59%	0.88%	0.95%	0.90%	0.67%	1.70%	1.41%
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.87%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPS and PPA in my portfolio?

RSPS and PPA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPS or PPA?

PPA has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to RSPS (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs PPA's -57.37%.

Which ETF is better, RSPS or PPA?

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.53% vs 4.15% for RSPS. On fees, RSPS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPS or PPA?

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.53% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPS or PPA?

RSPS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPS or PPA?

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.38% for PPA.

What is the main difference between RSPS and PPA?

RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.58% for PPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.