RSPR vs. UCO
RSPR (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPR is a REIT fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPR returned 6.43%/yr vs -11.98%/yr for UCO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.
Performance
RSPR vs. UCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 139.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPR has outperformed UCO with an annualized return of 6.43%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively lower -11.98% annualized return.
RSPR
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.43%
UCO
- 1D
- -3.93%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 139.34%
- 6M
- 124.58%
- 1Y
- 115.57%
- 3Y*
- 24.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- -11.98%
RSPR vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 9.95% | -1.88% | 8.61% | 11.59% | -25.16% | 49.61% | -2.90% | 24.62% | -4.11% | 8.76% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 139.34% | -29.75% | 5.36% | -13.89% | 39.71% | 139.26% | -92.91% | 53.83% | -43.26% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPR and UCO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015 | 0.08 |
The correlation between RSPR and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPR vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank
RSPR
UCO
RSPR vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPR | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.31 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 3.34 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 6.32 | -4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPR | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 2.03 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.36 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | -0.17 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | -0.34 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
RSPR vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and UCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPR | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.96% | -99.95% | +57.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -34.77% | +26.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.78% | -50.38% | +32.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.03% | -67.24% | +34.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.96% | -98.75% | +56.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -99.26% | +96.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -85.49% | +76.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 18.34% | -14.40% |
Volatility
RSPR vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is 4.15%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.99%. This indicates that RSPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPR | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 20.99% | -16.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 46.57% | -36.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.16% | 57.26% | -43.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 59.81% | -40.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 71.35% | -49.98% |
RSPR vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPR vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison
RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 2.62% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 2.91% | 3.14% | 2.56% | 3.82% | 2.48% | 3.02% | 3.01% | 2.06% | 1.03% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPR and UCO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCO has higher volatility (20.99%) compared to RSPR (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs UCO's -99.95%.
On 10-year performance, RSPR leads with 6.43% vs -11.98% for UCO. On fees, RSPR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPR has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSPR has performed better with a 6.43% return vs -11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.
RSPR has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.
RSPR is categorized as REIT, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while UCO tracks Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.95% for UCO.
UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPR and UCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer