PortfoliosLab logo
RSPM vs. PHO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSPM and PHO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

RSPM vs. PHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSPM:

-0.45

PHO:

0.25

Sortino Ratio

RSPM:

-0.58

PHO:

0.42

Omega Ratio

RSPM:

0.93

PHO:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

RSPM:

-0.38

PHO:

0.19

Martin Ratio

RSPM:

-1.03

PHO:

0.58

Ulcer Index

RSPM:

9.99%

PHO:

6.15%

Daily Std Dev

RSPM:

21.45%

PHO:

18.92%

Max Drawdown

RSPM:

-61.18%

PHO:

-55.63%

Current Drawdown

RSPM:

-14.54%

PHO:

-5.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPM achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than PHO's 3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPM has underperformed PHO with an annualized return of 7.87%, while PHO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.


RSPM

YTD

-1.87%

1M

3.65%

6M

-12.65%

1Y

-10.67%

3Y*

-2.32%

5Y*

11.79%

10Y*

7.87%

PHO

YTD

3.59%

1M

4.13%

6M

-4.89%

1Y

3.30%

3Y*

12.17%

5Y*

13.65%

10Y*

10.70%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco Water Resources ETF

RSPM vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSPM vs. PHO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSPM is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSPM is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSPM is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSPM is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSPM is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSPM is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PHO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHO is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHO is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHO is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHO is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHO is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHO is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSPM vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RSPM Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the PHO Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPM and PHO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RSPM vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison

RSPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than PHO's 0.49% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF
2.15%2.04%2.05%2.19%1.43%1.57%1.81%1.83%1.50%1.28%1.57%1.45%
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
0.49%0.45%0.59%0.49%0.20%0.39%0.43%0.46%0.34%0.47%0.75%0.59%

Drawdowns

RSPM vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPM drawdown since its inception was -61.18%, which is greater than PHO's maximum drawdown of -55.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPM and PHO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RSPM vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...