RSPM vs. FSDPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX).
RSPM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. FSDPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 28, 1986.
Performance
RSPM vs. FSDPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSPM vs. FSDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 13.67% | 6.90% | -1.30% | 8.32% | -9.95% | 31.21% | 22.77% | 25.11% | -14.75% | 25.87% |
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 9.58% | 11.32% | -2.95% | 7.29% | -9.86% | 31.66% | 21.78% | 12.40% | -23.74% | 25.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPM achieves a 13.67% return, which is significantly higher than FSDPX's 9.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPM has outperformed FSDPX with an annualized return of 11.14%, while FSDPX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.
RSPM
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -4.12%
- YTD
- 13.67%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
FSDPX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPM vs. FSDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FSDPX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSPM vs. FSDPX — Risk / Return Rank
RSPM
FSDPX
RSPM vs. FSDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPM | FSDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.54 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.38 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 4.68 | +0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPM | FSDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.38 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.42 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPM and FSDPX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSPM vs. FSDPX - Dividend Comparison
RSPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than FSDPX's 1.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.52% | 2.06% | 2.04% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.28% | 1.57% |
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 1.77% | 1.94% | 12.46% | 5.46% | 3.34% | 0.71% | 0.68% | 1.22% | 12.89% | 5.08% | 1.05% | 2.42% |
Drawdowns
RSPM vs. FSDPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPM drawdown since its inception was -61.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FSDPX drawdown of -64.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPM and FSDPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPM | FSDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.18% | -64.19% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.67% | -13.53% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -25.39% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.84% | -49.89% | +10.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.87% | -7.63% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -11.33% | +2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 4.00% | +0.74% |
Volatility
RSPM vs. FSDPX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) have volatilities of 6.48% and 6.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSPM | FSDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 6.64% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.58% | 13.61% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.71% | 20.54% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 20.29% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 21.64% | +0.27% |