RSPG vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
RSPG and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both RSPG and QQQM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RSPG vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSPG vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 33.74% | 7.01% | 6.09% | 4.49% | 57.97% | 57.73% | 36.72% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | -4.75% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 33.74% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -4.75% return.
RSPG
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 33.74%
- 6M
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 31.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 23.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
QQQM
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPG vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSPG vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
RSPG
QQQM
RSPG vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPG | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.09 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.68 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 2.02 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 7.35 | -3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPG | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.09 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.60 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.64 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPG and QQQM is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RSPG vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 1.95% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RSPG vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and QQQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPG | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.98% | -35.04% | -44.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.05% | -12.55% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | -35.04% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.04% | -7.86% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.63% | -8.47% | -17.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.55% | 3.44% | +4.11% |
Volatility
RSPG vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 6.30% and 6.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSPG | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 6.58% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.29% | 12.79% | +2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.69% | 22.45% | +5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.51% | 22.24% | +6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.58% | 22.26% | +11.32% |