RSPG vs. PWRZ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. RSPG is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.

Performance

RSPG vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RSPG

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 26.46%
• YTD: 31.88%
• 1Y: 38.02%
• 3Y*: 16.88%
• 5Y*: 23.71%
• 10Y*: 9.05%

PWRZ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPG vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	3.45%
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	-0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPG and PWRZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	0.50

Return for Risk

RSPG vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 61
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PWRZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPG vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPG	PWRZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.17	—	—

Drawdowns

RSPG vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and PWRZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPG	PWRZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.98%	-0.40%	-79.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.35%	-0.40%	-6.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.38%	-0.31%	-25.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.33%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSPG	PWRZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.04%	0.62%	+21.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.09%	0.62%	+27.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.47%	0.62%	+32.85%

RSPG vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPG vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison

RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	2.01%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPG and PWRZ in my portfolio?

RSPG and PWRZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSPG or PWRZ?

On fees, RSPG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPG or PWRZ?

RSPG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPG or PWRZ?

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.

What is the main difference between RSPG and PWRZ?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPG and 0.75% for PWRZ.