RSPF vs. SPYM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPF returned 11.37%/yr vs 15.62%/yr for SPYM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.

Performance

RSPF vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPF achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPF has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 11.37%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.

RSPF

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: -5.25%
• 6M: -2.72%
• 1Y: 2.40%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

SPYM

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 10.98%
• 1Y: 28.09%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: 15.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPF vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	-5.25%	10.23%	25.75%	6.43%	-10.64%	36.36%	5.49%	31.53%	-15.81%	21.57%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	10.98%	17.79%	25.00%	26.24%	-18.09%	28.78%	18.49%	31.99%	-4.78%	21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPF and SPYM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006	0.70

The correlation between RSPF and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPF vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPF	SPYM
Financial Services	92.7%	11.1%
Technology	6.1%	38.5%
Industrials	1.2%	7.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.6%
Energy	-	3.2%
Healthcare	-	8.4%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

RSPF vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPF

RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 10
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 10
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 11

SPYM

SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPF vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPF	SPYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	2.39	-2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	3.27	-2.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.44	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	3.17	-3.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.48	14.76	-14.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPF vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPF Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPF and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPF	SPYM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	2.39	-2.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.83	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.87	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.62	-0.41

Drawdowns

RSPF vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPF drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPF and SPYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPF	SPYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.32%	-54.46%	-26.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.13%	-8.90%	-5.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.26%	-18.72%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.68%	-24.48%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.80%	-33.87%	-10.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.99%	-0.66%	-7.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.04%	-7.15%	-11.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.05%	1.91%	+3.14%

Volatility

RSPF vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that RSPF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPF	SPYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	2.83%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.17%	8.90%	+2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	11.80%	+3.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.85%	16.80%	+3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.91%	18.00%	+4.91%

RSPF vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPF vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

RSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	1.70%	1.55%	1.65%	2.16%	1.95%	1.56%	2.24%	1.85%	2.51%	1.28%	37.55%	2.17%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	1.00%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.79%	2.23%	1.75%	1.97%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPF and SPYM in my portfolio?

RSPF and SPYM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPF or SPYM?

RSPF has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPF dropped -81.32% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

Which ETF is better, RSPF or SPYM?

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 11.37% for RSPF. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPF or SPYM?

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPF or SPYM?

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPF or SPYM?

RSPF has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

What is the main difference between RSPF and SPYM?

RSPF is categorized as Financials Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. RSPF tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPF and 0.02% for SPYM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.