RSPF vs. SCHV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC, while SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPF returned 11.37%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for SCHV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.

Performance

RSPF vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPF achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPF having a 11.37% annualized return and SCHV not far ahead at 11.50%.

RSPF

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: -5.25%
• 6M: -2.72%
• 1Y: 2.40%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

SCHV

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 15.39%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 28.49%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPF vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	-5.25%	10.23%	25.75%	6.43%	-10.64%	36.36%	5.49%	31.53%	-15.81%	21.57%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	15.39%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-7.65%	25.58%	2.64%	25.92%	-7.30%	16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPF and SCHV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009	0.86

The correlation between RSPF and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPF vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPF	SCHV
Financial Services	92.7%	19.6%
Technology	6.1%	18.2%
Industrials	1.2%	14.0%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%
Communication Services	-	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.8%
Energy	-	7.2%
Healthcare	-	11.3%
Real Estate	-	4.1%
Utilities	-	4.6%

Return for Risk

RSPF vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPF

RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 10
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 10
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 11

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 81
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPF vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPF	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	2.69	-2.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	3.84	-3.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.48	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	4.19	-4.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.48	16.96	-16.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPF vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPF Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPF and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPF	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	2.69	-2.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.72	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.68	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.72	-0.51

Drawdowns

RSPF vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPF drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPF and SCHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPF	SCHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.32%	-37.08%	-44.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.13%	-6.83%	-7.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.26%	-15.26%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.68%	-19.78%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.80%	-37.08%	-7.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.99%	0.00%	-7.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.04%	-3.83%	-15.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.05%	1.69%	+3.36%

Volatility

RSPF vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) at 3.09%. This indicates that RSPF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPF	SCHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	3.09%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.17%	8.13%	+3.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	10.63%	+4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.85%	14.51%	+5.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.91%	16.94%	+5.97%

RSPF vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPF vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

RSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than SCHV's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	1.70%	1.55%	1.65%	2.16%	1.95%	1.56%	2.24%	1.85%	2.51%	1.28%	37.55%	2.17%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.76%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPF and SCHV in my portfolio?

RSPF and SCHV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPF or SCHV?

RSPF has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to SCHV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPF dropped -81.32% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

Which ETF is better, RSPF or SCHV?

On 10-year performance, SCHV leads with 11.50% vs 11.37% for RSPF. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPF or SCHV?

Over the 10-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPF or SCHV?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPF or SCHV?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.70% for RSPF.

What is the main difference between RSPF and SCHV?

RSPF is categorized as Financials Equities, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. RSPF tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPF and 0.04% for SCHV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.