PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RSPD vs. IYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

RSPD vs. IYC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC).

RSPD and IYC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. IYC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2000. Both RSPD and IYC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RSPD vs. IYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSPD vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF		-5.92%7.98%13.37%22.55%-24.03%28.75%11.43%25.88%-8.79%15.04%
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF		-5.90%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSPD having a -5.92% return and IYC slightly higher at -5.90%. Over the past 10 years, RSPD has underperformed IYC with an annualized return of 7.36%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.03% annualized return.

RSPD

1D
2.92%
1M
-9.04%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-6.83%
1Y
8.38%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
7.36%

IYC

1D
2.72%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
-5.90%
6M
-7.30%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF

Often compared with RSPD:
RSPD vs. RSPRSPD vs. RSPTRSPD vs. VTIRSPD vs. XLYRSPD vs. SPHQRSPD vs. SPYRSPD vs. FDIS
Often compared with IYC:
IYC vs. XLYIYC vs. FDISIYC vs. CLDLIYC vs. ONLNIYC vs. VDCIYC vs. IOOIYC vs. SCHD

RSPD vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.

RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF

Return for Risk

RSPD vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RSPD
RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPD vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RSPDIYCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

0.51

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

0.91

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.12

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.85

-0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.98

2.85

-0.87

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPD vs. IYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is comparable to the IYC Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPD and IYC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RSPDIYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

0.51

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.28

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.56

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.41

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and IYC is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RSPD vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than IYC's 0.53% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF		1.05%1.08%0.84%1.09%0.99%0.53%0.81%1.59%1.67%1.45%1.27%1.37%
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF		0.53%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than IYC's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and IYC.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

RSPDIYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.00%

-53.10%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-12.49%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-35.90%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

-35.90%

-12.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.61%

-9.46%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-9.99%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

3.74%

+0.91%

Volatility

RSPD vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 5.84%. This indicates that RSPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

RSPDIYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

5.84%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

10.80%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.52%

20.10%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

20.68%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

19.86%

+3.16%