RSPC vs. XTL
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both Communications Equities funds - RSPC tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index while XTL tracks the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPC returned -0.41%/yr vs 17.03%/yr for XTL. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTL.
Performance
RSPC vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -10.27% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 36.88% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -10.27%
- 1Y
- -2.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.11%
XTL
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- 6M
- 26.64%
- YTD
- 36.88%
- 1Y
- 80.12%
- 3Y*
- 42.77%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $480.30K | $640.18K | $573.12K | |
| $11.74M | $12.06M | $21.53M |
RSPC vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -10.27% | 18.44% | 17.98% | 17.92% | -29.00% | 14.55% | 22.14% | 21.35% | -11.38% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 36.88% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and XTL is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSPC and XTL has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RSPC vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPC
XTL
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
RSPC
XTL
Technology
RSPC
XTL
Financial Services
RSPC
XTL
-
Basic Materials
RSPC
-
XTL
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPC
-
XTL
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPC
-
XTL
-
Energy
RSPC
-
XTL
-
Healthcare
RSPC
-
XTL
-
Industrials
RSPC
-
XTL
-
Real Estate
RSPC
-
XTL
Utilities
RSPC
-
XTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
XTL
RSPC vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPC | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.37 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 3.97 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 13.06 | -13.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, roughly equal to the maximum XTL drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -37.01% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -19.20% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -22.79% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.73% | -36.85% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.04% | -15.60% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -9.79% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.14% | 5.82% | +1.32% |
Volatility
RSPC vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 5.56%, while SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that RSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 8.95% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.12% | 24.38% | -13.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 31.47% | -16.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 25.65% | -6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 23.76% | -3.05% |
RSPC vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than XTL's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.83% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 1.27% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and XTL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTL has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to RSPC (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs XTL's -37.01%.
On 5-year performance, XTL leads with 17.03% vs -0.41% for RSPC. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RSPC has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XTL has performed better with a 17.03% return vs -0.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.
RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.27% for XTL.
RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.35% for XTL.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer