RSPC vs. QQQ
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPC returned -0.41%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
RSPC vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -10.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -10.27%
- 1Y
- -2.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.11%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.32B | $28.40B | $31.45B | |
| $480.30K | $640.18K | $573.12K |
RSPC vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -10.27% | 18.44% | 17.98% | 17.92% | -29.00% | 14.55% | 22.14% | 21.35% | -11.38% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 12.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -7.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and QQQ is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSPC and QQQ has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RSPC vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPC
QQQ
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
RSPC
QQQ
Technology
RSPC
QQQ
Financial Services
RSPC
QQQ
Basic Materials
RSPC
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
RSPC
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
RSPC
-
QQQ
Energy
RSPC
-
QQQ
Healthcare
RSPC
-
QQQ
Industrials
RSPC
-
QQQ
Real Estate
RSPC
-
QQQ
Utilities
RSPC
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
QQQ
RSPC vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.21 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.88 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 6.00 | -6.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -82.97% | +44.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -11.96% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -22.77% | +7.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.73% | -35.12% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.04% | -7.69% | -5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -32.62% | +19.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.14% | 3.74% | +3.40% |
Volatility
RSPC vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 5.56%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that RSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 6.87% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.12% | 16.08% | -4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 19.38% | -4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 22.90% | -4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 22.50% | -1.79% |
RSPC vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.83% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and QQQ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to RSPC (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 14.23% vs -0.41% for RSPC. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, RSPC has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 14.23% return vs -0.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.
RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.
RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer