RSPC vs. GXPC
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) are both Communications Equities funds - RSPC tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index while GXPC tracks the MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPC.
Performance
RSPC vs. GXPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -7.63% return, which is significantly lower than GXPC's 3.83% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- -7.63%
- 6M
- -4.38%
- 1Y
- 2.74%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.10%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPC
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPC vs. GXPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -7.63% | 4.96% |
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 3.83% | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and GXPC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. GXPC — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
GXPC
RSPC vs. GXPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPC | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPC | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.43 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. GXPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than GXPC's maximum drawdown of -16.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and GXPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -16.59% | -21.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.47% | -7.11% | -3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -3.05% | -9.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPC vs. GXPC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 19.79% | -6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 19.79% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 19.79% | +0.98% |
RSPC vs. GXPC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPC's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. GXPC - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than GXPC's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.76% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and GXPC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.
RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.12% for GXPC.
RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while GXPC tracks MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.15% for GXPC.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and GXPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer