PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPC vs. GXPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPC vs. GXPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -7.63% return, which is significantly lower than GXPC's 3.83% return.


RSPC

1D
-2.11%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
-7.63%
6M
-4.38%
1Y
2.74%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*

GXPC

1D
-0.34%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
3.83%
6M
3.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPC vs. GXPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSPC and GXPC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPC vs. GXPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPC
RSPC Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
RSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPC vs. GXPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPCGXPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.52

RSPC vs. GXPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPCGXPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

1.43

-1.11

Drawdowns

RSPC vs. GXPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than GXPC's maximum drawdown of -16.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and GXPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPCGXPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.03%

-16.59%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.47%

-7.11%

-3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.71%

-3.05%

-9.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.26%

Volatility

RSPC vs. GXPC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPCGXPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

19.79%

-6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

19.79%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

19.79%

+0.98%

RSPC vs. GXPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPC's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPC vs. GXPC - Dividend Comparison

RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than GXPC's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GXPC
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF
0.12%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
1.76%1.66%1.03%0.98%1.45%1.10%1.05%0.90%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPC and GXPC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.

RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.12% for GXPC.

RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while GXPC tracks MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.15% for GXPC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPC and GXPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer