RSPC vs. FDCF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and FDCF (Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. RSPC is passively managed, while FDCF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSPC returned 8.82%/yr vs 21.06%/yr for FDCF. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDCF.

Performance

RSPC vs. FDCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -10.27% return, which is significantly lower than FDCF's 0.82% return.

RSPC

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -1.81%
• 6M: -8.40%
• YTD: -10.27%
• 1Y: -2.47%
• 3Y*: 8.82%
• 5Y*: -0.41%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.11%

FDCF

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -3.29%
• 6M: 2.60%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 1Y: 9.32%
• 3Y*: 21.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF	$337.50K	$344.89K	$440.84K
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	$480.30K	$640.18K	$573.12K

RSPC vs. FDCF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	-10.27%	18.44%	17.98%	6.43%
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF	0.82%	27.42%	28.37%	17.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPC and FDCF is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2023	0.58

The correlation between RSPC and FDCF shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPC vs. FDCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPC	FDCF
Communication Services	85.6%	48.5%
Technology	14.3%	36.8%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPC vs. FDCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPC

RSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8
RSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
RSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FDCF

FDCF Risk / Return Rank: 18
FDCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FDCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FDCF Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FDCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FDCF Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPC vs. FDCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPC	FDCF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	0.34	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	0.60	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.07	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	0.38	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	1.08	-1.55

RSPC vs. FDCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the FDCF Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPC and FDCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPC vs. FDCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than FDCF's maximum drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and FDCF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPC	FDCF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.03%	-22.53%	-15.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.61%	-18.10%	+2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.61%	-22.53%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.04%	-6.35%	-6.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-4.18%	-8.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.14%	6.28%	+0.86%

Volatility

RSPC vs. FDCF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) at 4.96%. This indicates that RSPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPC	FDCF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	4.96%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.12%	15.77%	-4.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.65%	19.75%	-5.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	20.69%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	20.69%	+0.02%

RSPC vs. FDCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FDCF's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPC vs. FDCF - Dividend Comparison

RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FDCF's 0.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF	0.07%	0.09%	0.25%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	1.83%	1.66%	1.03%	0.98%	1.45%	1.10%	1.05%	0.90%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPC and FDCF in my portfolio?

RSPC and FDCF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPC or FDCF?

RSPC has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to FDCF (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs FDCF's -22.53%.

Which ETF is better, RSPC or FDCF?

On 3-year performance, FDCF leads with 21.06% vs 8.82% for RSPC. On fees, RSPC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FDCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPC or FDCF?

Over the 3-year period, FDCF has performed better with a 21.06% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPC or FDCF?

RSPC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDCF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPC or FDCF?

RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.07% for FDCF.

What is the main difference between RSPC and FDCF?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.50% for FDCF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.