RSP vs. IAU
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 12.15%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for IAU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
RSP vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -2.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSP having a 12.15% annualized return and IAU not far ahead at 12.31%.
RSP
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
IAU
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
RSP vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.96% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | -2.44% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and IAU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2005 | 0.07 |
The correlation between RSP and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSP vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
IAU
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
RSP
IAU
-
Financial Services
RSP
IAU
-
Industrials
RSP
IAU
-
Healthcare
RSP
IAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
IAU
-
Consumer Defensive
RSP
IAU
-
Real Estate
RSP
IAU
Utilities
RSP
IAU
-
Energy
RSP
IAU
-
Basic Materials
RSP
IAU
-
Communication Services
RSP
IAU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
IAU
RSP vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSP | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.19 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 0.99 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.63 | 2.83 | +6.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSP vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -45.14% | -14.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -24.40% | +16.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -24.40% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -24.40% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -24.40% | -14.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.03% | +22.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -15.97% | +9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 8.47% | -6.40% |
Volatility
RSP vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 3.57%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 7.70% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 23.94% | -15.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.83% | 27.17% | -15.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 18.16% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 16.02% | +2.34% |
RSP vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSP and IAU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to RSP (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 12.31% vs 12.15% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 12.31% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while IAU is Gold. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.25% for IAU.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer