PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSP vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSP vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 51.75% return.


RSP

1D
0.98%
1M
1.02%
6M
9.94%
YTD
14.26%
1Y
21.56%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
11.89%
ALL TIME*
11.34%

HIBL

1D
7.65%
1M
-11.68%
6M
34.09%
YTD
51.75%
1Y
117.87%
3Y*
40.02%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.60M$5.92M$6.50M
$1.90B$1.83B$2.07B

RSP vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
14.26%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%4.41%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
51.75%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and HIBL is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

0.86

The correlation between RSP and HIBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSP vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSP
HIBL

Technology

16.9%
46.6%

Financial Services

14.8%
12.4%

Industrials

14.6%
15.8%

Healthcare

11.8%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
12.4%

Utilities

6.6%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
0.8%

Real Estate

6.0%

-

Basic Materials

4.6%
2.1%

Energy

4.2%
0.2%

Communication Services

3.3%
2.1%

Technology

RSP
16.9%
HIBL
46.6%

Financial Services

RSP
14.8%
HIBL
12.4%

Industrials

RSP
14.6%
HIBL
15.8%

Healthcare

RSP
11.8%
HIBL
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RSP
9.5%
HIBL
12.4%

Utilities

RSP
6.6%
HIBL
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

RSP
6.2%
HIBL
0.8%

Real Estate

RSP
6.0%
HIBL

-

Basic Materials

RSP
4.6%
HIBL
2.1%

Energy

RSP
4.2%
HIBL
0.2%

Communication Services

RSP
3.3%
HIBL
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSP vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSP vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.95

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.69

10.01

+0.68

RSP vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSP vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

-88.27%

+28.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-40.14%

+32.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-69.66%

+51.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-81.58%

+60.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-27.29%

+27.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-43.54%

+36.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

11.82%

-9.80%

Volatility

RSP vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 2.96%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 29.17%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

29.17%

-26.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

65.64%

-57.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

79.06%

-67.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

83.80%

-67.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

92.56%

-74.27%

RSP vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSP vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, which matches HIBL's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.49%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.48%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSP and HIBL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (29.17%) compared to RSP (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.69% vs 9.15% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

RSP and HIBL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.48%.

RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 1.12% for HIBL.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSP and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer