RSP vs. EQAL
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and EQAL (Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while EQAL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 11.86%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for EQAL. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
RSP vs. EQAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than EQAL's 12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has outperformed EQAL with an annualized return of 11.86%, while EQAL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
EQAL
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
RSP vs. EQAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | 12.35% | 11.05% | 11.38% | 11.98% | -13.49% | 23.14% | 16.57% | 24.54% | -9.22% | 17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and EQAL is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2014 | 0.96 |
The correlation between RSP and EQAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSP vs. EQAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
EQAL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSP
EQAL
Financial Services
RSP
EQAL
Industrials
RSP
EQAL
Healthcare
RSP
EQAL
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
EQAL
Consumer Defensive
RSP
EQAL
Utilities
RSP
EQAL
Real Estate
RSP
EQAL
Energy
RSP
EQAL
Basic Materials
RSP
EQAL
Communication Services
RSP
EQAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. EQAL — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
EQAL
RSP vs. EQAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSP | EQAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 1.99 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.85 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 3.66 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 12.89 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSP | EQAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.99 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.40 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.57 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.51 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
RSP vs. EQAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than EQAL's maximum drawdown of -40.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and EQAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | EQAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -40.44% | -19.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -6.67% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -19.62% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -21.79% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -40.44% | +1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.73% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -5.10% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.89% | +0.17% |
Volatility
RSP vs. EQAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 2.56%, while Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | EQAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 3.05% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | 8.61% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 12.30% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 17.28% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 18.88% | -0.53% |
RSP vs. EQAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RSP and EQAL have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. EQAL - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than EQAL's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | 1.64% | 1.79% | 1.62% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.32% | 1.63% | 1.61% | 1.62% | 1.18% | 1.57% | 1.64% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, RSP and EQAL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EQAL has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs EQAL's -40.44%.
On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.86% vs 10.66% for EQAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP and EQAL have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
EQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while EQAL is Mid Cap Blend Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index.
EQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and EQAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer