PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSINX vs. TSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSINX vs. TSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) and Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund (TSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSINX achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than TSMDX's 8.45% return. Over the past 10 years, RSINX has outperformed TSMDX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while TSMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.38% annualized return.


RSINX

1D
2.11%
1M
4.78%
6M
10.55%
YTD
14.37%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
8.67%

TSMDX

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.12%
6M
5.60%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
8.38%
ALL TIME*
8.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RSINX vs. TSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
14.37%6.39%20.81%13.18%-2.02%25.73%-1.68%28.02%-9.55%16.36%
TSMDX
Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund
8.45%7.85%7.73%9.42%-17.85%23.18%15.93%25.84%-13.14%18.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RSINX and TSMDX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2015

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between RSINX and TSMDX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSINX vs. TSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSINX
RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMDX
TSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSINX vs. TSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) and Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund (TSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSINXTSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

1.41

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

5.21

+3.55

RSINX vs. TSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the TSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSINX and TSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSINX vs. TSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSINX drawdown since its inception was -66.11%, which is greater than TSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSINX and TSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSINXTSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.11%

-40.15%

-25.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-11.65%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.23%

-23.21%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-27.54%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

-40.15%

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.32%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.49%

-7.55%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.94%

-0.55%

Volatility

RSINX vs. TSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) and Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund (TSMDX) have volatilities of 3.43% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSINXTSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.50%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

10.82%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

15.16%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.99%

19.47%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

20.57%

-1.51%

RSINX vs. TSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSINX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMDX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSINX vs. TSMDX - Dividend Comparison

RSINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while TSMDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
3.90%4.46%10.21%0.77%4.03%15.89%0.30%4.32%17.89%14.37%0.00%
TSMDX
Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%6.29%2.47%2.80%2.24%0.12%4.62%5.09%1.72%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSINX and TSMDX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMDX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to RSINX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSINX dropped -66.11% vs TSMDX's -40.15%.

RSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSINX and TSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer